Fragility index (FI) measures the “fragility” of a clinical trial by iteratively switching the outcomes of a single trial arm and evaluating whether or not the trial becomes non-signifcant. It therefore measures the number of patient outcomes required for a statistical test to change. FI has been suggested to be an easy-to-understand metric of a clinical trial’s robustness, which may pair well with other frequently discussed metrics like p-values and we are interested in how FI may differ based on different clinical trial characteristics. This project investigates the fragility index using real world data in addition to baseline information about clinical trials. More details regarding our motivation can be found here.
Obtaining our dataset is the hardest portion of this project. After various trial and error, we decided to use clinicaltrials.gov as our data source. This is a website provided by U.S. National Library of Medicine that stores information on studies being conducted around the world.
At first, we set the main target to autoimmune disorders related clinical trials. However, the resulting dataset wasn’t big enough for us to conduct further analysis. Therefore, we broadened our criteria to US-based phase III clinical trials.
This project ended up utilizing two manually created datasets:
A quick summary of our findings include:
For detailed results, analysis and output, please refer to our report.
A work by Bryan Bunning, Yuanzhi Yu, Zongchao Liu, Gavin Ko, and Kevin S.W.
© Copyright 2019 The Fragility Index Project Team, All Rights Reserved | Powered by Github.io